April 21, 2008...6:05 pm

Skyfarming: Big Budget Development of Urban Agriculture

Jump to Comments

Just came across this article in New York Magazine, written a few weeks ago by Lisa Chamberlain.

hey

When I took a glimpse of the image above, I saw a valiant attempt at an organic system packaged and marketed to fit the “profitable development” aesthetic. The funny thing is that urban farming can be even simpler than large-scale projects such as this facility. According to verticalfarm.com, the idea was born 6-years ago, but let us not forget the hanging gardens of Baghdad amongst other ancient examples of maximizing growing pace vertically. In 1900, many people in New York still had chickens atop their houses and veggies in their city gardens. It is the lifestyle of the people that has brought a halt to urban farming, not the limitations of the possibility. Though for our particular system, a development such as this one might save us from high oil prices and would completely revolutionize the food market – perhaps even make food cheaper and better. This particular accomplishment would have to rely on architects and building contractors to work with farmers and botanists — a formula for a great collaboration of minds and industries.

Though the potential for such a development should not bring us enough comfort to stop striving to be more and more self-sufficient and beneficial to our environment. According to this project’s creators, “Roughly 150 such buildings could feed the entire city of New York for a year… and even produce a net output of clean water and energy” — great, but wouldn’t some of us still be aching for a source of energy less… processed… ?

building

skyfarm

food factory

To me, any form of industrial monoculture, no matter how much it increases the yield tends to repell my interest. Though in the case of this tomato tutorial, I found it can be usefully applied even when planting clusters instead of rows. Here is another great how-to-grow tomato site that is very easy to navigate and rather useful.

Ahem, sorry to digress. But where were we? Oh, right! I guess the moral of this post is to remind any other urban farmers out there not to let the challenges of attaining a successful yield in a dense and polluted city bog you down. One tomato plant in a city might yield you a little more than one kilo, which would cost $10 or more at whole foods. You could fit about a dozen plants a square a foot apart from each other in a 9 sq. foot space to save yourself more than $100 on good summer tomatoes.

Now try thinking about the kinds of vegetables you eat and what it takes to grow them. Some of the following resources might help:

Bio-intensive farming (you should google/wikipedia the term, if you are unfamiliar with the practice) works great for cities:
If you use the resources above to plan an efficiently yielded garden from the get-go, you might surprise yourself and end up with more unspent money than projected. Of course, there will be bumps along the road and obviously it is hard to make such bold assumptions. It is true that there are many many more limitations to self-sufficiency in the city. It takes a great deal more commitment and going against the grain

How much money can one save on vegetables in a city during a best-case-scenario growing season? This is one of those things I’ve been dying to figure out, but I’m not sure because each net-yield for anyone’s particular circumstance varies on scenario. Though popular conventions are abundant. The search for answers will require a collaboration between the experience of others and my own.

Though I shall amuse myself for now with this podcast from City Farmer TV (that I just added to my sidebar)!

Leave a Reply